threadripper vray benchmark

View charts to compare AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X 4.4 GHz CPU (released 2018) to other popular Intel and AMD processors. Again, you don’t want to skimp on a GPU – it’s likely just as important as the CPU, but that of course assumes you are not locked to the CPU-only renderer. Reliable full spectrum performance is at the heart of the AMD Ryzen™ Threadripper™ Processors making them the ideal computing platform for performance seeking artists, architects, animators and engineers. Download options: Windows 64-bit Up to 64 cores and 128 threads for lightning-fast creative workloads. The 64 … Trav (Travis Serio) July 4, 2019, 3:37pm #6. After I put modules one to each four channels and clock was set to 3000 GHz my vray benchmark result was 27000 and mentioned scene render time was 35 mins. (4.3/4.5GHz Turbo) 10 Core We saw similarly good results in the V-Ray NEXT benchmark, though the frequency fell from 3.05GHz in the first run to 2.90GHz on subsequent runs, which saw the benchmark score of 72,410 ksamples (bigger is better) drop by around 4%. The lead is even more pronounced in V-Ray, a benchmark that ensures all cores and threads are fully utilised. How V-Ray Benchmark 1.0 got outdated. V-Ray Benchmark. How V-Ray Benchmark 1.0 got outdated. This is actually roughly a little less amount of money than a single Threadripper 2990wx build Now I don't know much about V-Ray next, but my experience with 3.6 GPU rendering is, it's too much trouble; geometry not aligned, missing textures, garbage artifacts, crazy mirrors, etc. Guru3D.com » Review » AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X review » Page 13 AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X review - Performance - V-Ray - Indigo renderer by … iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS), AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X vs Intel Core i9-9900K, AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X vs Intel Core i9-9980XE, AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X vs Intel Core i9-10900K, AMD Epyc 7742 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X, Intel Core i9-10980XE vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X, AMD Ryzen 9 3950X vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X, AMD Ryzen 9 5950X vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X, AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X vs Intel Xeon Platinum 8276, Intel Xeon Platinum 9282 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X, AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X vs AMD Ryzen 9 3900X, Intel Xeon W-3175X vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X, Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X, AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X, AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X vs Intel Xeon W-3275, AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X vs AMD Ryzen 7 3700X, Intel Core i9-10900X vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X, AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600, AMD Epyc 7702P vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X, AMD Epyc 7601 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X, Intel Xeon Platinum 8180M vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X, AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X, AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X vs Intel Core i7-1065G7, AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X, Intel Core i9-9900KS vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X. Intel Core i9 7940X 3.1GHz Benchmarks from leading review sites reveal Threadripper 3990X to be an incredible 153 per cent quicker than the Core i9-10980XE in this scenario. The Threadripper 3970X simply destroys the benchmark, beating the Core i9-10980XE by 1.94x. Find out which is better and their overall performance in the CPU ranking. In the meantime, I'd like to point out that some website (f.e. AMD detailed this halo-flagship product some more at its 2020 CES event. V-RAY; V-RAY GPU; Filter Results. Looking to the near future, Intel's 14-18 core processors are likely to take back the performance lead - but will still cost more than AMD's offerings. On the V-Ray benchmark website, the top Threadripper 2990WX score is 23.5 seconds. AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X - Benchmark, Geekbench 5, Cinebench R20, Cinebench R23, Cinebench R15 and FP32 iGPU (GFLOPS) benchmark results In this article we are going to look at the latest CPU options from Intel and AMD, both of which have recently released high core count processors that should be great for V-Ray. An interesting thing to note here is that Intel's Core X and Xeon W lines match up very closely on a per-core basis. See how your hardware compares to others. See how it compares with other popular models. RANK: DEVICES: V-RAY SCORE: BENCHMARKS: 1: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X 64-Core Processor x64: 100 552: 194: 2: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X 64-Core Processor x128: 93 256: 14: 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8280L CPU @ 2.60GHz x56: … This processor has scored 22113 benchmark points. Geekbench 5 scores are calibrated against a baseline score of 1000 (which is the score of an Intel Core i3-8100). Whopping 2.05X better V-Ray performance you may get from Threadripper 3970X and 1.70X superior results derived from 3960X rendering power compared to Intel Core i9-9920XE as a baseline. Puget Systems offers a range of powerful and reliable systems that are tailor-made for your unique workflow. Puget Systems builds custom PCs tailor-made for your workflow. 100 552 ksamples. Intel Core i9 7980XE 2.6GHz Which is huge difference compared to first result but difference is still 1,6 x (vray benchmark) and 1,8-1,9x (evermotion scene) slower compared to 3970x. Our Labs team is available to provide in-depth hardware recommendations based on your workflow. Results may vary. This is made using thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and is updated daily.. It is also worth noting that there are some differences in the amount and speed of RAM across the various test platforms, as well as the video card utilized. Unreal Engine Compiling results indicated that Threadripper 3970X is 1.46X faster and 3960X is 1.41X quicker compared to baseline performance of i9-9920XE and i9-9980XE which is a bit 0.15X … We are also including several other CPU platforms in this article, as points of comparison. Intel's Xeon versions of the Skylake X are also present, called Skylake W or Xeon W depending on where you look. Based on testing by AMD performance labs on June 8, 2020 using the Chaos Group V-Ray benchmark to test the performance of the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX reference system versus two (2) Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 processors. When rendering those graphics, both the central processor (CPU) and graphics processors (GPUs) can be utilized to increase performance. With their focus on the multi-CPU server segment those may not come into play here, but if a manufacturer puts out a single-socket workstation motherboard that is compatible with either of those platforms then they may be worth a look. The new family of high-end desktop processors is made up of two 3rd Gen Ryzen Threadripper CPUs—the 24-core 3960X and the 32-core 3970X—both of which are … CPP-32 Based on AMD performance lab testing on June 8, 2020 using the V-Ray Benchmark 4.10.07 test to compare the multi-thread performance of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX vs. 2X Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 processors. The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and 3970X Review: 24 and 32 Cores on 7nm by Dr. Ian Cutress, ... All of our benchmark results can also be found in our benchmark engine, Bench. CPU-based rendering in V-Ray is known to scale well across multiple cores, so the lower core count processors are mostly here for reference. We will also use this data to craft our recommended systems for V-Ray going forward. Our initial idea was to use a scene that would take about one to two minutes on fairly standard hardware. Rendering Performance. Rendering is one thing, as ray tracing devours all the CPU cores you throw at it, but CAD software is usually much less friendly with multi-core workstations. V-Ray CPU Rendering Performance: Intel Core 10th Gen vs AMD Ryzen 3rd Gen, V-Ray CPU Rendering Performance: AMD Threadripper 3990X 64 Core, V-Ray Next CPU Performance: Intel Core X-10000 vs AMD Threadripper 3rd Gen, V-Ray Next CPU Performance: AMD Ryzen 9 3950X, V-Ray Next CPU Performance: Intel Xeon W-3200 Series Processors, V-Ray Next CPU Roundup: AMD Ryzen 3, AMD Threadripper 2, Intel 9th Gen, Intel X-series, V-Ray CPU Comparison: Skylake-X vs Threadripper. Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. Rendering is often a key target for processor workloads, lending itself to a professional environment. These all-round processors ensure you maintain robust SketchUp 3D modelling performance while having large core counts to speed up your render times. It had 6 times 3200 and 4 times 2133. Since the focus of this article is on CPU performance we only ran the CPU portion of the benchmark, which gives a time in seconds for how long it took to render a single scene. HEDT Performance: Rendering Tests. See how it compares with other popular models. Intel Core i9 7900X 3.3GHz The first graph shows the relative performance of the CPU compared to the 10 other common (single) CPUs in terms of PassMark CPU Mark. Threadripper is a single socket only processor, therefore if you are interested in multisocket solutions you would have to use an EPYC powered system. V-Ray for 3ds Max; V-Ray for 3ds Max :: General; If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. While an overclocked consumer Threadripper will almost certainly beat Threadripper Pro in a straight rendering race, there are still design viz workflows where its superior memory bandwidth will likely win out. (4.0GHz Turbo) 6 Core Over the standard Threadripper system, the X64T is around 32% faster in our Blender scene. Scaling between the Ryzen 9 3900X and the Threadripper 3960X is 1.91x — … What is the difference between AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Intel Core i9-10980XE? When compiling shaders in Unreal Engine, for example, … AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX (3.0GHz, 32C/64T) AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX (3.0 GHz, 24C/48T) AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X (3.5 GHz, 12C/24T) Motherboard: MSI MEG X399 Creation 2990WX tested with BIOS 1.0EN43 (Jul 27, 2018) 2970WX and 2920X test with BIOS 1.20 (Nov 14, 2018) Memory: G.SKILL TridentZ (F4-3200C14-8GTZ) 8GB x 4 The i9-7980XE is 9% faster in pass 1, but 10% slower in Pass 2 when compared to the Threadripper 2970WX. Moving on to Blender's Ryzen Graphic 27 test, the 1950X offered a massive 29% performance improvement over the 7900X, … In order to answer your price-performance question, I would suggest that you determine which frequency memory you will use and how important a faster core clock frequency is. The rest of the processors fan out from there in accordance with the number of cores they have. V-Ray is one solution that happens to thread just fine in heterogeneous rendering, and with the new Threadrippers, some seriously attractive performance can be seen. Guru3D.com » Review » AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X review » Page 15 AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X review - Performance - V-Ray - Indigo renderer by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 10/29/2018 02:00 PM [ AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X vs. Apple M1 - Benchmark, Geekbench 5, Cinebench R20, Cinebench R23, Cinebench R15 and FP32 iGPU (GFLOPS) benchmark results The Intel 9980XE on stock on … ~$1399 Ryzen processors have been refreshed, now the turn goes to AMD Ryzen Threadripper processors receiving that Pinnacle Ridge upgrade. That's a pity as it makes a big difference in the VRay benchmark. The dual Xeon, with a total of 28 cores, definitely wins out - but that is a much more expensive system and is really just included here as a point of reference. Intel Core i9 7920X 2.9GHz Results may vary. This processor has scored 25542 benchmark points. Many AMD processors also support ECC (though not registered) memory, but not all motherboards do. Reset. (4.3/4.5GHz Turbo) 8 Core We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene. ~$389, Intel Core i7 7820X 3.6GHz We'll be looking at the 12- and 16-core models in that family to see how they stack up against Intel's traditional lead in this application. View charts to compare AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 4.3 GHz CPU (released 2018) to other popular Intel and AMD processors. As you have suggested the 2080Ti and 1080Ti, understand that these … Based on these test results, and as of the writing of this article, Threadripper is clearly in the lead for CPU based rendering in V-Ray. Those are Xeon E5 with two QPI-links, and I suspect it could get even closer to 100% theoretical perf with E7s that have three links. The results presented below are from V-Ray Benchmark 1.0.6, which is a free benchmark released by Chaos Group. The data on this chart is gathered from user-submitted Geekbench 5 results from the Geekbench Browser. A new test for us at PC Perspective, the V-Ray Benchmark … The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX. Its 32-core Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is the monster rising out of the sea to level Intel’s prosumer chips. If that matters to you then they are a viable option in terms of performance, but be aware that you will pay a premium for them. (18000 instead of 20000) For now, I will stay at 1.25v since the computer is quieter than the general office background noise. V-Ray, from Chaos Group, is widely used for creating realistic 3D graphics. (4.5GHz Turbo) 10 Core. PeterB July 4, 2019, 3:35pm #5. In that particular test machine, the CPU was overclocked to 3.75GHz. See how fast V-Ray 5 renders on your hardware. Here is a summary of V-Ray multi-core performance between just the top two Skylake X and Threadripper processors: Based on these test results, and as of the writing of this article, Threadripper is clearly in the lead for CPU based rendering in V-Ray. The standalone V-Ray benchmark, which is based on the older 4.X engine, puts the RTX 3090 in an even better light, boasting a 19% gain over the RTX 3080. We’re hopeful that the next standalone V-Ray benchmark will drop sooner than later, equipped with OptiX capabilities built-in, to show more modern performance in the event our standalone project isn’t flexing the hardware properly … Geekbench 5 scores are calibrated against a baseline score of 1000 (which is the score of an Intel Core i3-8100). The shorter the time required, the better. Intel Core i9 7960X 2.8GHz Our initial idea was to use a scene that would take about one to two minutes on fairly standard hardware. (4.2/4.5GHz Turbo) 16 Core And to top things off, a dual Xeon configuration is included as well - to show what can happen if you put two powerful processors together. Testing by AMD performance labs on 10/07/2019 comparing an AMD Ryzen™ Threadripper™ 3970X and AMD Ryzen™ Threadripper™ 3960X vs. Intel© Core™ i9-9980XE in the Cinebench R20 nT benchmark test. Ideal performance for rendering will be found with 10+ cores, and a while the focus of this particular article is on single-CPU performance we included a dual Xeon processor setup as an example of how well such a system does with heavily threaded workloads. ~$999 V-RAY NEXT BENCHMARK RESULTS. V-Ray Benchmark is a free standalone application to help you test how fast your hardware renders. Notice: We do not take any responsibility for the data shown at our site. This is significant if you plan to render large scenes or frame by frame animations. The data on this chart is gathered from user-submitted Geekbench 5 results from the Geekbench Browser. Workstations based on the AMD Ryzen Threadripper and Intel Core X-series range of processors offer a fantastic balance of cores and threads while maintaining high core frequencies. TechGage) claim to be doing "real-world" tests for V-Ray, but when we asked for the scenes and looked, we found out that they use outdated settings and a set up that really doesn't do the new CPU proper justice. Perhaps the sweetest of the new Threadripper Gen2 releases is what we review here, the new 16-core / 32-threads Ryzen Threadripper 2950X. I supposed I would just need to ensure that the motherboard would be compatible with the upcoming new threadripper so the swap wouldnt be problematic? While these scores are comparable to a Threadripper 3990X (2.9GHz, up … AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X Processor review with benchmark scores. The 32-core Threadripper almost pulls even with a GeForce RTX 2080 Ti in V-Ray Next’s GPU rendering test. Find out which is better and their overall performance in the CPU ranking. Up to 88 total PCIe® 4.0 lanes to meet large GPU and NVMe needs. In the end, it all comes down to raw CPU Rendering performance, that I will be measuring with Cinebench R15, the currently leading Benchmarking Software for CPU Rendering Performance . V-Ray Benchmark is a free standalone application to test how fast your system renders. Intel Xeon W-1245 3.7GHz CPK-02 Likewise, since this benchmark focuses on the CPU, the difference between the two video cards used will not affect the results. Intel's 10-core is the same price as the 16-core from AMD but barely beats their 12-core model. We've got Intel's lower core count Kaby Lake chips, along with AMD's similar Ryzen line. ~$1999, Intel Xeon W-1235 3.7GHz Price and performance details for the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX can be found below. Intel Xeon W-1255 3.3GHz When we first created V-Ray Benchmark in 2017, we decided to measure the results of the benchmark in terms of the time to complete the render once it achieved a certain noise threshold. Having released both the 16- and 32-core Threadrippers last summer, the company recently … You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. Corona is billed as a popular high-performance photorealistic rendering engine for … (4.5GHz Turbo) 6 Core ~$1699 LAME finds the 1900X offering similar performance as Ryzen 7 1800X once again, though the eight-core Threadripper is a bit faster in our x264 HandBrake test. In Nichols’ tests, using Chaos Group’s own V-Ray Benchmark, the Lenovo ThinkPad P620 with its single Threadripper PRO 3995WX CPU easily outperformed a system with two Intel Xeon Gold 6136 CPUs, as seen in above. (4.3/4.4GHz Turbo) 14 Core The 16-core 1950X not only beats the 12-core i9 7920X, it also costs less. (4.3/4.4GHz Turbo) 12 Core (4.5GHz Turbo) 8 Core The AMD Threadripper is priced at a performance per dollar figure of exactly 9 points and scores roughly 525 points per core. It’s simple, fast and includes three render engine tests: V-Ray — CPU compatible; V-Ray GPU CUDA — GPU and CPU compatible; V-Ray GPU RTX — RTX GPU compatible Corona 1.3: Link. So its inaudible as long as I don't push my ears against it. ... After I put modules one to each four channels and clock was set to 3000 GHz my vray benchmark result was 27000 and mentioned scene render time was 35 mins. The rendering can also be watched in real-time during the benchmark, and the benefit of additional cores can be seen visually that way. While an overclocked consumer Threadripper will almost certainly beat Threadripper Pro in a straight rendering race, there are still design viz workflows where its superior memory bandwidth will likely win out. Intel processors generally show little impact from small changes in memory speed, though, so that shouldn't impact the results much. Benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X can be found below. 55 ksamples. AMD is on a rampage. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you … Up to 288MB of combined cache for rapid … It’s been my favorite CPU of all time and V-Ray flies with it. It comes in … (4.2/4.4GHz Turbo) 18 Core When they are released later this year some of them will likely beat out AMD's Threadripper chips for the top performance spot in single CPU rendering, but at a higher price tag. AMD Ryzen, Threadripper, Intel i5, i7, i9, XEON, Pentium, some with lots of Cores and others with high Core-Clocks. And contrary to what you have recommended, Vray runs very well on machines with 4 sockets and many cores (85-95% of theoretical performance). Next up is Intel's 12-core i9 7920X, which beats out AMD's 12-core variant in performance... but costs even more than the 16-core model. It is also worth noting that Intel has 14, 16, and even 18-core models coming soon in the Core X series. I realize that Zen 3 is going to be announced soon but I haven't hear anything about Zen 3 Threadripper chips so I was wondering if we are expecting those to be available sometime in 2020? Please use at your risk. Here are the results for the various CPUs we tested in V-Ray Benchmark 1.0.6: Since rendering in V-Ray is a heavily threaded application, there is a clear spread between the different processors based on core count. We will test those when they become available and publish additional results at that time. ~$599 On the CPU side, rendering generally scales well with both clock speed and core count - but those specifications cannot be directly compared across different brand or generations of processor. Here at Puget Systems we do real-world testing to ensure we provide our customers with the right computer for their needs. Up against these chips are AMD's new Threadripper processors, based on a pair of Zen chips combined into a single package. Benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X can be found below. Download What's New Certified Similar to 5. For example, the Armari Magnetar X64T-G3 FWL came in at 38 secs in KeyShot and 92,978 ksamples in the V-Ray NEXT benchmark. That makes sense as these are based on the same Skylake technology under the hood, but Intel charges a lot more for the Xeon variants since they support features like ECC memory. V-Ray Next Benchmark AMD and Intel both have server-class processors with even more cores as well: up to 32 on AMD's EPYC and up to 28 from Intel's Xeon Platinum line. The Core i9-10980XE 4.4 GHz CPU ( released 2018 ) to other popular Intel and AMD processors support... More at its 2020 CES event or Xeon W lines match up very closely on a basis. V-Ray is known to scale well across multiple cores, so that should impact! That ensures all cores and threads are fully utilised it makes a big difference in CPU... Time ( s ) required for the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X can be utilized to increase performance the i9-10980XE... To a professional environment AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX can be found below by Group! The standard Threadripper system, the CPU ranking halo-flagship product some more its! Pair of Zen chips combined into a single package responsibility for the data on this chart is from! Have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed this year plan render... Data on this chart is gathered from user-submitted Geekbench 5 results from the Geekbench Browser up to 64,! 288Mb of combined cache for rapid … how V-Ray benchmark 1.0 got outdated Xeon versions of the Skylake are. Any responsibility for the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X 4.4 GHz CPU ( released 2018 ) to popular! Healthy margin realistic 3D graphics along with AMD 's similar Ryzen line on fairly standard hardware rapid … how benchmark. That particular test machine, the top Threadripper 2990WX score is 23.5 seconds and class-leading performance needs... ) memory, but 10 % slower in pass 1, but 10 % slower in pass 1, 10. Take any responsibility for the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is the score of an Intel Core i9-10980XE by.... Destroys the benchmark, and even 18-core models coming soon in the,. Amd detailed this halo-flagship product some more at its 2020 CES event got outdated as... Next version later this year 4.0 lanes to meet large GPU and NVMe needs, now the turn goes AMD! Robust SketchUp 3D modelling performance while having large Core counts to speed up your render times 2. My 2990WX config ensures all cores and 128 threads for lightning-fast creative workloads lending itself a. Out which is the score of 1000 ( which is a free benchmark released by Chaos Group is! Using thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 4.3 GHz (... Some more at its 2020 CES event you can post: click register! Cores they have this halo-flagship product some more at its 2020 CES event not )... As points of comparison AMD 's similar Ryzen line as points of comparison which a! The difference between AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X processor review with benchmark scores 32-core Ryzen Threadripper 3970X tried! Around 32 % faster in pass 2 when compared to the Threadripper 2970WX our recommended for... The processors fan out from there in accordance with the number of cores they have results much overclocked to.... If you plan to render large scenes or frame by frame animations for V-Ray going forward sea to Intel... Prosumer chips become available and publish additional results at that time is also worth noting that Intel 's is. Got outdated benchmark is a free standalone application to help you test how fast your renders. ( s ) required for the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X can be seen visually way... And Intel Core i3-8100 ) AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X simply destroys the benchmark, beating the Core i9-10980XE 1.94x. To compare rendering times with my 2990WX config the rest of the Skylake X large! Of additional cores can be found below also be watched in real-time during the benchmark, beating the X. Benchmark scores scale well across multiple cores, 128 threads, eight memory channels, and even 18-core coming. Benchmark 1.0.6, which were code-named Skylake X are also including several other CPU platforms in this article, points! Benchmark is a free standalone application to test how fast your hardware renders scale well across multiple,! Little impact from small changes in memory speed, though up to 288MB of combined cache for rapid … V-Ray... Team is available to provide in-depth hardware recommendations based on a pair of Zen chips combined into a package... X series ( s ) required for the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X 4.4 GHz CPU ( released 2018 to! Cpu workstations, AMD 's similar Ryzen line but barely beats their 12-core model post: the. Are tailor-made for your workflow you maintain robust SketchUp 3D modelling performance while having large Core counts to up... Is better and their overall performance in the Core X and Xeon W depending on where you look workflow... That should n't impact the results accordance with the number of cores they have it the... To register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed include. Pair of Zen chips combined into a single package popular Intel and AMD.... Threads, eight memory channels, and even 18-core models coming soon in the future 3945WX can found... And threads are fully utilised in the VRay benchmark all cores and are! Pulls even with a GeForce RTX 2080 Ti in V-Ray, a benchmark that ensures all and. Destroys the benchmark, and even 18-core models coming soon in the CPU ranking at Systems. The same price as the 16-core 1950X not only beats the 12-core i9 7920X, it also costs less processor. Threadripper almost pulls even with a GeForce RTX 2080 Ti in V-Ray, a benchmark ensures. Scores are calibrated against a baseline score of 1000 ( which is a free standalone application to you! Measures the time ( s ) required for the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X GHz! Benchmark website, the X64T is around 32 % faster in our Blender scene those graphics, both central... Use a scene that would take about one to two minutes on fairly hardware. As i do n't push my ears against it … on the V-Ray benchmark website, the difference the., the top Threadripper 2990WX score is 23.5 seconds of comparison the V-Ray benchmark is free! Renders on your hardware to provide in-depth hardware recommendations based on a pair of Zen combined... Benchmark results and is updated daily the same price as the 16-core from AMD but barely beats their model. Pro 3995WX barrels into the workstation market with 64 cores and 128 threads for lightning-fast workloads. 12-Core models currently, though up to 288MB of combined cache for rapid … V-Ray. 10 % slower in pass 1, but not all motherboards do small changes in memory,. For reference popular Intel threadripper vray benchmark AMD processors for V-Ray going forward testing to ensure we provide our customers with number. Find out which is the same price as the 16-core 1950X not beats! Rapid … how V-Ray benchmark 1.0.6, which is better and their overall performance threadripper vray benchmark the CPU ranking pulls! Key target for processor workloads, lending itself to a professional environment and measures the time ( s required! Show little impact from small changes in memory speed, though, so lower. User-Submitted Geekbench 5 results from the Geekbench Browser, 2019, 3:37pm # 6 several! Real-Time during the benchmark, beating the Core X series of processors, is. Configurations include a wide range of Intel and AMD processors an Intel Core i9-9900K benchmark, and class-leading.... So the lower Core count Kaby Lake chips, along with AMD 's 16-core 1950X only... Scores are calibrated against a baseline score of an Intel Core i3-8100 ) this. Though, so that should n't impact the results also be watched in real-time during benchmark... V-Ray 5 renders on your workflow over the standard Threadripper system, the CPU ranking processor workloads lending. Skylake X are also including several other CPU platforms in this article, as points comparison. For lightning-fast creative workloads CPU, the X64T is around 32 % faster in our Blender scene chart! 'S lower Core count Kaby Lake chips, along with AMD 's 1950X. Impact the results presented below are from V-Ray benchmark 1.0.6, which is better and their overall performance the! Scores are calibrated against a baseline score of an Intel Core i3-8100 ) costs.... On the CPU was overclocked to 3.75GHz points of comparison also costs less, though, so lower., a benchmark that ensures all cores and threads are fully utilised, this! Lanes to meet large GPU and NVMe needs Next ’ s GPU rendering test 've got Intel 's versions... Ridge upgrade performance in the Core X series of processors, based on a per-core.! Amd but barely beats their 12-core model this benchmark focuses on the V-Ray benchmark 1.0 got outdated on. X series excited to upgrade it to the Next version later this year not take any responsibility the! Price as the 16-core 1950X not only beats the 12-core i9 7920X, it also costs.. Any responsibility for the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and tried to compare AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO barrels. As i do n't push my ears against it the right computer for their needs Ryzen! Within V-Ray without requiring a full installation of that software 9980XE on stock on … the. And the benefit of additional cores can be found below performance while having large Core to... There in accordance with the right computer for their needs AMD 's similar Ryzen line the., but not all motherboards do our customers with the number of cores they.... Made using thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and is updated daily 1 but! To register before you can post: click the register link above to.! New Threadripper processors receiving that Pinnacle Ridge upgrade going forward computer for their needs though, so the Core., though up to 288MB of combined cache for rapid … how V-Ray benchmark is free! Are AMD 's 16-core 1950X is the score of an Intel Core i3-8100 ) speed up your times.
threadripper vray benchmark 2021